An Information Collection Request (ICR) is a federal agency's request for approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to collect information from the public.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), agencies must justify why the information is needed and how it will be used.
Federal agencies are required to submit an ICR whenever they create, renew, or modify an information collection. Each ICR includes a description of the collection,
supporting materials and documentation (such as forms, surveys, or scripts), and proof that the agency has met the requirements of the PRA.
The ICR is submitted to the The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within OMB for review and approval. OIRA grants approval for a maximum of three years, after
which the collection must be renewed through a new ICR submission.
ICRs are publicly available on RegInfo.gov, and additional guidance can be found in the FAQs.
Note: Presidential Action influences are notated for ICRs received between January 20, 2025 and July 19, 2025.
Showing 20 of 14581 results
Reference Number
|
Title
|
Agency
|
Received
|
Status
|
Request Type
|
Presidential Action
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 202205-2060-006 | NESHAP for Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLLLL) (Renewal) | EPA/OAR | 2022-05-23 | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
NESHAP for Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLLLL) (Renewal)
Key Information
Abstract
The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing apply to both existing facilities and new facilities that manufacture asphalt roofing products or oxidized asphalt that are major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) or are collocated at major sources. New facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of the original proposal (November 21, 2001). In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLLLL. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-2060-005 | NESHAP for Aluminum, Copper, and Other Non-Ferrous Foundries (40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZZZ) (Renewal) | EPA/OAR | 2022-05-23 | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
NESHAP for Aluminum, Copper, and Other Non-Ferrous Foundries (40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZZZ) (Renewal)
Key Information
Abstract
The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Aluminum, Copper and Other Non-ferrous Metals Foundries apply to both existing and new facilities conducting melting operations located at an aluminum, copper, or other non-ferrous foundry that is an area source of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emissions, melts 600 tons per year (tpy) of aluminum, copper, or other non-ferrous metal or greater, and uses material that contains or has the potential to emit HAP for which the source category was listed. New facilities include those that commenced construction, modification or reconstruction after the date of proposal. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZZZ. . |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-2060-004 | NESHAP for Semiconductor Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, Subpart BBBBB) (Renewal) | EPA/OAR | 2022-05-23 | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
NESHAP for Semiconductor Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, Subpart BBBBB) (Renewal)
Key Information
Abstract
The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Semiconductor Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart BBBBB) were proposed on May 8, 2002, and promulgated on May 22, 2003. These regulations apply to existing facilities and new facilities that emits or has the potential to emit, considering controls, in the aggregate, any single hazardous air pollutants (HAP) at a rate of 10 tons per year (tpy) or more or any combination of HAP at a rate of 25 tpy or more. New facilities include those that commenced construction, modification or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart BBBBB. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202202-1845-001 | Federal Student Aid (FSA) Feedback System | ED/FSA | 2022-05-23 | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Federal Student Aid (FSA) Feedback System
Key Information
Abstract
This is a request for extension of the current information collection of the FSA Feedback System, OMB Control 1845-0141. On March 10, 2015, the White House issued a Student Aid Bill of Rights. Among the objectives identified was the creation of a centralized complaint system that is now resident and supported via the Federal Student Aid/Customer Engagement Management System. The purpose of the Customer Engagement Management System (CEMS) is to meet the objective: “Create a Responsive Student Feedback System: The Secretary of Education will create a new web site by July 1, 2016, to give students and borrowers a simple and straightforward way to file complaints and provide feedback about federal student loan lenders, servicers, collections agencies, and institutions of higher education. Students and borrowers will be able to ensure that their complaints will be directed to the right party for timely resolution, and the Department of Education will be able to more quickly respond to issues and strengthen its efforts to protect the integrity of the student financial aid programs.” |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-3095-003 | Requests for Civilian Service Records (formerly Forms Relating to Civilian Service Records) | NARA | 2022-05-23 | Historical Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Requests for Civilian Service Records (formerly Forms Relating to Civilian Service Records)
Key Information
Abstract
Former Federal civilian employees and other authorized individuals use this information collection in order to obtain information from Official Personnel Folders or Employee Medical Folders. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-2060-007 | NSPS for Petroleum Refineries for which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced after May 14, 2007(40 CFR part 60, subpart Ja) (Renewal) | EPA/OAR | 2022-05-23 | Received in OIRA | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
NSPS for Petroleum Refineries for which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced after May 14, 2007(40 CFR part 60, subpart Ja) (Renewal)
Key Information
Abstract
The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), for which Construction, Re-construction, or Modification Commenced after May 14, 2007 (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ja) were proposed on May 14, 2007, promulgated on June 24, 2008, and amended on: September 26, 2008; September 12, 2012; December 19, 2013; December 1, 2015 ; and July 13, 2016 . The provisions of Subpart Ja apply to the following affected facilities in petroleum refineries: fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCU), fluid coking units (FCU), delayed coking units, fuel gas combustion devices (FGCD), process heaters, flares and sulfur recovery plants. Except for flares, these regulations apply to affected facilities at existing and new petroleum refineries that are constructed, reconstructed, or modified after May 14, 2007. The provisions of this subpart apply to flares which commence construction, modification or reconstruction after June 24, 2008. New facilities include those that commenced construction, modification or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ja. In general, all NSPS standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NSPS. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-1557-004 | Leveraged Lending | TREAS/OCC | 2022-05-21 | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Leveraged Lending
Key Information
Abstract
The OCC, FRB, and FDIC issued guidance on leveraged lending, setting forth high-level principles related to safe and sound leveraged lending activities, including underwriting considerations, assessing and documenting enterprise value, risk management expectations for credits awaiting distribution, stress testing expectations and portfolio management, and risk management expectations. All financial institutions should have the capacity to properly evaluate and monitor underwritten credit risks, to understand the effect of changes in borrowers' enterprise values upon credit portfolio quality, and to assess the sensitivity of future credit losses to changes in enterprise values. Under the guidance, institutions should have: (i) underwriting policies for leveraged lending, including stress-testing procedures for leveraged credits; (ii) risk management policies, including stress testing procedures for pipeline exposures; and (iii) policies and procedures for incorporating the results of leveraged credit and pipeline stress tests into the firm's overall stress-testing framework. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202203-3235-007 | Crowdfunding Rules 400-404 (Funding Portals) | SEC | 2022-05-20 | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Crowdfunding Rules 400-404 (Funding Portals)
Key Information
Abstract
Regulation Crowdfunding prescribes rules governing the sale and offer of securities under Section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act of 1933, and provides a framework for the regulation of registered funding portals and brokers that issuers are required to use as intermediaries in the offer and sale of securities in reliance on Section 4(a)(6). |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202202-0704-010 | Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification | DOD/DODDEP | 2022-05-20 | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification
Key Information
Abstract
Pursuant to 48 CFR, part 27, in conjunction with subpart 4.4 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, contracting officers shall determine whether access to classified information may be required by a contractor during contract performance. When access to classified information is required, DoD Components shall use the “Contract Security Classification Specification,” DD Form 254, as an attachment to contracts or agreements requiring access to classified information by U.S. contractors. 32 CFR Part 117 requires that Government Contracting Activities (GCAs) use DD Form 254 to provide security classification guidance to a contractor in connection with a classified contract. 32 CFR Part 117 also requires that cleared U.S. prime contractors provide contract security classification specifications to their U.S. cleared subcontractors when access to classified information is required in connection with a subcontract. The NISP Contract Classification System (NCCS) serves as the centralized electronic repository for the DD Form 254. NCCS expedites the processing and distribution of contract classification specifications for contracts requiring access to classified information, using automated workflows and automated review process. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-0693-001 | SURF Fellow Housing Application | DOC/NIST | 2022-05-20 | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
SURF Fellow Housing Application
Key Information
Abstract
The purpose of this collection is to gather information requested on behalf of the NIST Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF) Program for both Gaithersburg and Boulder locations. Students participating in the program receive a fellowship which includes lodging arranged by the agency. To coordinate the lodging, information is submitted by accepted students which require lodging during the program dates. The student information is utilized for roommate matching based on gender and common interests. The information includes: identification of accepted laboratory, housing requirement (yes or no), first name, last name, dates requesting housing, gender, roommate identification, name of academic institution of enrollment, preferences (night owl, early bird, neatness, smoking), and special requests. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202202-3235-014 | Regulation S-ID, Identity Theft Red Flags Rules | SEC | 2022-05-20 | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Regulation S-ID, Identity Theft Red Flags Rules
Key Information
Abstract
Regulation S-ID, and the information collection it requires, is designed to better protect consumers from the risks of identity theft. The regulation requires entities that are subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction to address identity theft in two ways. First, the rules and guidelines require financial institutions and creditors to develop and implement a written identity theft prevention program designed to detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft in connection with certain existing accounts or the opening of new accounts. Second, the rules establish special requirements for any credit and debit card issuers that are subject to the Commission's jurisdiction, to assess the validity of notifications of changes of address under certain circumstances. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202104-1028-004 | National Digital Trails Project – Trails Data Portal | DOI/GS | 2022-05-20 | Received in OIRA | New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
National Digital Trails Project – Trails Data Portal
Key Information
Abstract
A major component of the Department of Interior’s vision is to “Increase access to outdoor recreation opportunities for all Americans so that our people can be healthier, more fully enjoy the wonderful features of their federal lands, and take advantage of hunting, fishing, and other outdoor recreation pursuits that are the roots of the conservation movement.” |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-1210-001CF | Requirements Related to Surprise Billing: Qualifying Payment Amount, Notice and Consent, Disclosure on Patient Protections Against Balance Billing, and State Law Opt-in | DOL/EBSA | 2022-05-20 | Historical Active | RCF Recertification
Requirements Related to Surprise Billing: Qualifying Payment Amount, Notice and Consent, Disclosure on Patient Protections Against Balance Billing, and State Law Opt-in
Key Information
|
- | ||||||||||||
| 202110-3235-001 | Rule 12b-1 [17 CFR 270.12b-1] under the Investment Company Act of 1940: Distribution of Shares by Registered Open-end Management Investment Company | SEC | 2022-05-20 | Active | Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection
Rule 12b-1 [17 CFR 270.12b-1] under the Investment Company Act of 1940: Distribution of Shares by Registered Open-end Management Investment Company
Key Information
Abstract
Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act (17 CFR 270.12b-1) permits a mutual fund to bear expenses associated with the distribution of its shares, provided that the fund complies with certain requirements. Rule 12b-1 requires, among other things, that the fund adopt a written plan describing all material aspects of the proposed financing of distribution ("rule 12b-1 plan"). The rule 12b-1 plan must be approved by the fund's board of directors, including the independent directors (as described in the rule), and, if the rule 12b-1 plan is being adopted after public offering of the fund's voting securities, by a majority of the fund's outstanding voting securities. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-3145-002 | Grantee Reporting Requirements for the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials (PREM) Program | NSF | 2022-05-20 | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Grantee Reporting Requirements for the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials (PREM) Program
Key Information
Abstract
The NSF Partnership for Research and Education in Materials (PREM) program provides significant support ($0.5-0.6 million / year) for research, education, and infrastructure with a renewable term of 5 years, for a total investment of $2.5-3.0M. Because of the duration and size of these awards, it is necessary for the NSF to ensure that its substantial investment is spent appropriately, that each of the PREMs meets the goals stated in its strategic plan, and that each PREM's activities satisfy the goals and objectives of the PREM program. The PREM program currently funds a total of 32 active awards, For effective oversight of these substantial investments, the NSF requires that each currently funded PREM submit an annual progress report that describes all its activities. Each PREM is expected to submit a final report at the end of the award. Data contained in these reports are also submitted to a website managed by a contractor for NSF. Electronic submission will facilitate program-wide data analysis. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202202-1218-002 | Pilot Study and Prospective Analysis of the Draft Revised Form 33, Safety and Health Program Assessment Worksheet | DOL/OSHA | 2022-05-19 | Active | New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
Pilot Study and Prospective Analysis of the Draft Revised Form 33, Safety and Health Program Assessment Worksheet
Key Information
Abstract
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is requesting approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), to conduct validity and reliability analyses of a safety and health program (SHP) assessment worksheet, the Draft Revised Form 33 (DRF33), that will replace the current SHP Assessment Worksheet, OSHA Form 33, used by the OSHA On- Site Consultation Program (OMB #1218– 0110). The studies that will be conducted on the DRF33 will enable OSHA to ensure that a valid, reliable, and efficient tool is provided to On-Site Consultation programs in the fifty (50) states, the District of Columbia, and several United States territories to replace the current OSHA Form 33, thereby, enhancing the quality of consultative services. The studies for which OSHA is requesting approval will comprise a pre- test (20 consultation visits; to assess Pilot Study procedures and information technology platform, and correct any issues before launching the Pilot Study), Pilot Study (300 consultation visits; to assess the validity and reliability of the DRF33), a follow-up study (30 consultation visits; to assess any updates to the DRF33 resulting from Pilot Study findings), and a Prospective Analysis (conducted 12 months after the Pilot Study to assess any impact of the DRF33 at workplaces that received consultation visits during the Pilot Study). After completing the Pilot Study, OSHA will request OMB approval before implementing the DRF33 for use by state On-Site Consultation programs nationwide (to replace the current Form 33). Similarly, OSHA will seek OMB approval if any additional updates are made to the approved worksheet, following the Prospective Analysis. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202103-2120-004 | Safety Management System for Certificated Airports | DOT/FAA | 2022-05-19 | Active | New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
Safety Management System for Certificated Airports
Key Information
Abstract
The final rule requires applicable certificate holders to submit an updated Airport Certification Manual (ACM) for review and approval. It also requires submission of an implementation plan based on a staggered submission schedule (hub airports within 12 months of the effective date; 100,000+ operations airports within 18 months of the effective date; and internationals within 24 months of the effective date). The intent of the implementation plan is for the certificate holder to identify its plan for implementing SMS within the applicable areas and map its schedule for implementing the SMS requirements. While the implementation plan’s main purpose is to guide the certificate holder’s implementation, the plan also provides a basis for the FAA’s oversight during the development and implementation phases. The FAA’s review and approval of the implementation plan ensures that the certificate holder is given feedback early and before they may make significant capital improvements as part of their SMS development and implementation. In addition to updating the ACM, the certificate holder will collect data including hazard reports, Safety Risk Management (SRM) documentation, SMS related training records, and safety communications. The regulation does not require the certificate holder to submit this data to the FAA; rather, the certificate holder will use this data as part of its continuous improvement efforts and to proactively identify hazards and instances of non-compliance with safety requirements and standards. The certificate holder is required to provide data upon request, usually during the FAA’s periodic inspection. The final rule does not prescribe how the certificate holder must collect or retain data; rather it simply requires the types of records and length of time for retention. Airport operators applying for an Airport Operating Certificate would be required to comply with the SMS requirements prior to certification if they meet the triggering criteria identified in the regulation. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-0570-002CF | Disclosure of Lobbying Activities | USDA/RBS | 2022-05-19 | Active | RCF New
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Key Information
|
- | ||||||||||||
| 202205-0970-010 | Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative | HHS/ACF | 2022-05-19 | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative
Key Information
Abstract
The Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative is sponsored by the Children’s Bureau (CB) in the Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF), Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Evaluation activities have been underway since initially approved in September 2021. Through these initial activities, the study team has identified additional information that is necessary for a full understanding of the functioning and outcomes of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative. As a result, CB currently seeks approval for six additional data collection efforts, which were conceptualized and planned as a result of what has been learned. They represent a second part of the data collection activities already underway for this study. These additional information collection activities support the approved data collections under this OMB number and are necessary to reach the overarching goals of the evaluation: to track, monitor, and evaluate the activities of the Collaborative which includes three federally funded Centers (Center for States [CBCS], Center for Tribes [CBCT], and Center for Courts [CBCC]) that deliver national child welfare expertise and evidence-informed training and technical assistance (TA) services to state, tribal, and territorial public child welfare agencies and Court Improvement Programs (CIPs) [henceforth referred to as jurisdictions]. The collective goal of the Centers is to build the capacities of jurisdictions to successfully undertake practice, organizational, and systemic reforms necessary to implement federal policies, meet federal standards, and achieve better outcomes for the children, youth, and families they serve. |
- | ||||||||||||
| 202201-2133-001 | Determination of Fair and Reasonable Rates for the Carriage of Agricultural Cargoes on U.S. Commercial Vessels--46 CFR | DOT/MARAD | 2022-05-19 | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Determination of Fair and Reasonable Rates for the Carriage of Agricultural Cargoes on U.S. Commercial Vessels--46 CFR
Key Information
Abstract
This collection of information requires U.S.-flag operators to submit vessel-operating costs and capital costs data to MARAD’s Office of Financial Approval on an annual basis. The collection is used by MARAD to calculate fair and reasonable rates for U.S.-flag vessels engaged in the carriage of preference cargoes. The collected information is mandatory. |
- |